
Undisciplined
Future models of funding and evaluating transdisciplinary research [completed]


Future models of funding and evaluating transdisciplinary research [completed]

Research funding landscape analysis

RoRI Atlas of Peer Review

Advancing Research on Research Use to Enhance Positive Impact

The uses and evaluation of researchers’ narrative CVs

Translating Publish-Review-Curate outputs into actionable signals for research funders: A MetaROR Study


A study of cumulative advantages in funding allocation [completed]

Getting responsible about AI and machine learning in research funding and evaluation [completed]

A Secure Collaboration Hub for Metascience

Exploring gender inequality in research funding

New geographies of research assessment
New geographies of research assessment
The Atlas of Assessment is a webtool developed as part of the AGORRA project. It aims to collect information on national research assessment systems for all countries across the globe, creating the first global overview of national research assessment exercises. This is an especially critical task for two reasons. First, national systems for research assessment have gained increasing prominence and diversity in recent years. Second, the literature on national research assessment systems has so far been strongly focused on a small selection of countries from the global north.
Launched in May 2025 with information on 13 countries, the team is now engaged in the task of populating the Atlas as far as possible, ultimately enabling a global analysis of what kinds of assessment systems are more/less common, whether we see different kinds of systems in different places and, if so, why.
The Atlas of Assessment was built and is maintained via the AGORRA project, which has the following funding organisations represented in its steering group:
Since the first national research assessment exercises took place 40 years ago, there has been a proliferation of national systems of research assessment. These systems are variously used to allocate institutional research funding, to gather intelligence about a country’s research strengths, and to induce behaviour change in the sector.
Besides a range of different aims, national research assessment systems also use a range of different methods and approaches and focus on different levels of assessment (e.g. institutions, departments or individuals). As this diversity of systems increases, so does the need to systematically map them at a global level, to track evolution, convergence and divergence, emerging trends, and assess what works, and in what contexts.
Much of the literature on national research assessment focuses only on a small number of countries, typically from the global north. But to fully understand trends, convergences, divergences, and how different systems and contexts have different needs, a far more comprehensive perspective is required.

The Atlas of Assessment accomplishes this task. The Atlas website went live in May 2025 with 13 initial tester-countries included. The ambition is to populate it with information on as many countries as possible, including countries from the global south, which have been neglected in most existing literature on national research assessment systems.
To aid analysis and also help users navigate and sort through the Atlas, it is structured through an 8-part typology of national assessment systems that has been developed through the AGORRA project and published as a working paper.

The research phase dedicated to populating the Atlas and conducting an initial global; analysis runs from May 2025 until December 2026. The ambition is for the Atlas to become a permanent tool with the fullest possible country-coverage and regular updates to all countries included.
This work around the Atlas will produce three main outputs:
This project is a workstream of the AGORRA project. As it is one of RoRI’s Platforms intended potentially to become permanent (i.e. beyond the end of AGORRA) we present it here as a RoRI activity in its own right.
We publish timely essays, reflections and signals from across metascience, research policy and reform. Expect original thinking, reactions to live debates, and practical insights from people studying research.