What are you looking for?

Atlas of Assessment

New geographies of research assessment

The Atlas of Assessment is a webtool developed as part of the AGORRA project. It aims to collect information on national research assessment systems for all countries across the globe, creating the first global overview of national research assessment exercises. This is an especially critical task for two reasons. First, national systems for research assessment have gained increasing prominence and diversity in recent years. Second, the literature on national research assessment systems has so far been strongly focused on a small selection of countries from the global north.

Launched in May 2025 with information on 13 countries, the team is now engaged in the task of populating the Atlas as far as possible, ultimately enabling a global analysis of what kinds of assessment systems are more/less common, whether we see different kinds of systems in different places and, if so, why.

A platform offering expertly curated and quality-assured data on national research assessment systems from around the world

Project lead, CWTS-Leiden and Senior Research Fellow, RoRI

Alex Rushforth

Senior Research Fellow

Senior Research Fellow, RoRI and Assistant Professor at CWTS, Leiden University

Alex Rushforth is Assistant Professor at CWTS, Leiden University, the Netherlands. He works in the social studies of science, with particular focus on research evaluation. Alex has longstanding interests in the uses of indicators in research and evaluation settings and his current research interests focus on the emergence, implementation and (un)intended effects of reform policies for research assessment.

Alex is currently coordinator of RoRi’s AgoRRA Project, with James Wilsdon and Claire Fraser.

Kolarz

Peter Kolarz

Head of Programmes

Head of Programmes, RoRI 

Pete is part of the core leadership team at RoRI. Current roles include leading the oversight of RoRI’s project portfolio and supporting leadership of the AFIRE and AGORRA projects. Pete is also involved in scoping and designing RoRi’s future portfolio of projects and programmes. 

Formerly a principal consultant at Technopolis, Pete has 12 years’ experience in the field of science and research policy, having managed or directed over 30 projects and worked as a researcher on many more. Highlights from this body of work include a major study on 38 modifications to peer review for grant funding, evaluating UKRI’s research funding response to Covid-19 (process and impact), a peer-learning initiative on partnered research programmes for the GRC, and two major impact assessments for the European Social Survey (ESS). Beyond the above, Pete has worked for clients including the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Research Council of Norway, Wellcome, the Academy of Finland, the Royal Society, the Human Frontier Science Program, and the Austrian Science Fund. 

Pete is a researcher, project manager, communicator and coach, with ample experience of sharing their expertise at several academic and professional conferences and at organisations including the OECD, the GRC, the German Data Forum (RatSWD) and the UK’s House of Lords. They hold a PhD in sociology from the University of Sussex and subsequently published a book on new directions for centre-left politics in the age of globalisation. Pete is a fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, an associate fellow of the Higher Education Academy/ Advance HE and a fluent speaker of English and German. 

CWTS-Leiden and Research Fellow, RoRI

Nina Gogadze

Research Fellow

Research Fellow, RoRI and PhD Candidate at CWTS, Leiden University

Nina Gogadze is a PhD candidate at the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University. 

Nina is an alumna of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master’s Degree Programme in Research and Innovation in Higher Education (MARIHE) and holds a master’s degree from the University for Continuing Education Krems and Tampere University.

Her research interests include research assessment reform movements, national research evaluation systems, and the Europeanisation of higher education and science policies in post-Soviet countries.

DST, Indian Institute of Science (ISC), India and Research Fellow, RoRI

Moumita Koley

Research Fellow

Research Fellow, RoRI and Senior Research Analyst at DST-Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science

Moumita Koley is a senior research analyst at the DST-Centre for Policy Research, IISc, Bangalore, India. She also worked as a consultant for the International Science Council’s Future of Scientific Publishing project between March 2023 and June 2024.

Her research interest is in enhancing the accessibility of scientific output, making the research ecosystem more efficient and responsible, and ensuring that research is responsive to local problems.

Moumita holds a Ph.D. in organic chemistry from the Vienna University of Technology in Austria, where she focused on synthesising small molecules that can direct the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells towards heart muscle cells. Later, she became interested in exploring the structure and evolution of science, including various dimensions of open science, such as open access, open research data, and research evaluation.

CONICET, Argentina and Research Fellow, RoRI

Laura Rovelli

Research Fellow

Research Fellow, RoRI and Independent Researcher, the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) in Argentina

Laura Rovelli is an independent researcher at the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) in Argentina, and professor at La Plata National University (UNLP) in Argentina. She is interested in research assessment change and policies in Latin America, with a focus on research assessment ideas and instruments, incentives for open science and doctoral evaluation, and research training in higher education.

Laura Rovelli is a political scientist and has a PhD in Social Science from the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. From 2020 to 2024, she coordinated the Latin American Forum for Research Assessment (FOLEC) from the Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO) and since 2022 onwards, she is a member of the Executive Board of DORA.

At present, she leads a research project on the potentialities and challenges in early academic career researchers in Latin America and is member of CLACSO’s WG “Open Science as a Common Good”.

Post navigation

The Atlas of Assessment was built and is maintained via the AGORRA project, which has the following funding organisations represented in its steering group:

Australian Research Council (ARC)

An independent body reporting to the Australian Government Minister for Education and Youth. The ARC administers a significant component of Australia’s investment in research and development, provides advice to the Minister on matters related to research, and assesses the quality, engagement and impact of university research.

Dutch Research Council (NWO)

Dutch Research Council (NWO)

The national research council of the Netherlands, ensuring quality and innovation in science. NWO selects and funds research proposals based on the advice of experts from science and society from the Netherlands and abroad. NWO encourages national and international collaboration, invests in large-scale research facilities, promotes knowledge utilisation, and manages research institutes.

National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF-SA)

National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF-SA)

The primary public sector agency tasked with providing funding across the research system in South Africa. As the single largest funder of human capital development in the country, through its Research, Innovation and Impact Support and Advancement (RIISA) programme, the NRF offers funding opportunities along the entire research pipeline – from the next-generation researchers to emerging researchers and established researchers.

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Canada’s federal funding agency for health research. Composed of 13 Institutes, they collaborate with partners and researchers to support the discoveries and innovations that improve our health and strengthen the healthcare system.

ANVUR (Agenzia Nazionale Di Valutazione Del Sistema Universitario E Della Ricerca)

ANVUR, through its evaluation activities, aims to enhance the quality of higher education and research, with the objective of increasing its presence and visibility on the international stage, particularly within the European context. Through its initiatives, it contributes to ensuring the quality of the higher education system, promoting the achievement of increasingly high standards, guiding the allocation of public resources, and enhancing the international standing of institutions.  

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine

The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine’s goal is to build a sustainable system where everyone has equal opportunities for developing their talent throughout life.

MES creates and implements state policy to increase the nation’s education, develop science and technology, and ensure the EU standards and practices are being implemented in education in Ukraine.

Research Council Norway (RCN)

The Research Council of Norway (RCN) is the national funding agency for research and experimental development (R&D) and R&D-supported innovation of Norway. Our task is to make the best research and innovation possible. The Research Council works to foster new ideas, promote ground-breaking research and radical innovation and cultivate a society in which research is created, used and shared, and thus contributes to restructuring and enhanced sustainability.

Since the first national research assessment exercises took place 40 years ago, there has been a proliferation of national systems of research assessment. These systems are variously used to allocate institutional research funding, to gather intelligence about a country’s research strengths, and to induce behaviour change in the sector. 

Besides a range of different aims, national research assessment systems also use a range of different methods and approaches and focus on different levels of assessment (e.g. institutions, departments or individuals). As this diversity of systems increases, so does the need to systematically map them at a global level, to track evolution, convergence and divergence, emerging trends, and assess what works, and in what contexts.

Much of the literature on national research assessment focuses only on a small number of countries, typically from the global north. But to fully understand trends, convergences, divergences, and how different systems and contexts have different needs, a far more comprehensive perspective is required. 

The Atlas of Assessment accomplishes this task. The Atlas website went live in May 2025 with 13 initial tester-countries included. The ambition is to populate it with information on as many countries as possible, including countries from the global south, which have been neglected in most existing literature on national research assessment systems.

To aid analysis and also help users navigate and sort through the Atlas, it is structured through an 8-part typology of national assessment systems that has been developed through the AGORRA project and published as a working paper.

The research phase dedicated to populating the Atlas and conducting an initial global; analysis runs from May 2025 until December 2026. The ambition is for the Atlas to become a permanent tool with the fullest possible country-coverage and regular updates to all countries included.

This work around the Atlas will produce three main outputs:

  1. Atlas of Assessment to be populated to the greatest possible extent. We hope to have information on 50-100 countries included by the end of this workstream (may include countries confirmed not currently to have any national research assessment systems).
  2. Aggregate findings report: combining the collected Atlas data and the 8-part typology of assessment systems developed in AGORRA, we will produce a report highlighting trends and patterns in assessment systems. Foremost, this will include overall prevalence of specific system characteristics (e.g. how common is a focus on societal impact? How common are systems that focus on individual researchers vs departments vs institutions?). Where possible, we will also highlight whether different system characteristics appear more commonly in certain types of countries (e.g. global north/global south, large/small, centralised/federated). Depending on the details of the findings, this may take the shape of a short RoRI Insights report, or a more formal extended data report.
  3. Working paper: Following the deep-dive on specific countries/systems, we will produce a working paper highlighting the trends and overall global picture noted above, alongside results of the qualitative deepdive. This will include an analysis that will seek to explain why we see different types of systems in different places and contexts. If feasible, we may include theoretical and/or practical frameworks to define and provide advice on what works, where and why.

This project is a workstream of the AGORRA project. As it is one of RoRI’s Platforms intended potentially to become permanent (i.e. beyond the end of AGORRA) we present it here as a RoRI activity in its own right.

Subscribe on Substack

We publish timely essays, reflections and signals from across metascience, research policy and reform. Expect original thinking, reactions to live debates, and practical insights from people studying research.