Matthew
Narratives
GRAIL
Funder Data Platform
AGORRA
Undisciplined
Peer Review
Portfolios
MetaROR
AFIRE
A joint initiative of AIMOS and RoRI, this new peer review platform is free to authors and readers
In the past five years, we’ve witnessed an incredible surge in innovation and energy directed towards metaresearch. Scholars from diverse disciplines have converged to form vibrant communities, pioneering new methodologies and research practice, to understand and improve how research findings are produced and disseminated.
This is exciting, but it also presents challenges, particularly in how we communicate and evaluate research.
The challenges we face in the field of metaresearch:
These problems are also present in other fields, but we believe the field of metaresearch has a particular responsibility to develop and test innovative solutions.
To this end, RoRI and the Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science (AIMOS) are launching MetaROR (MetaResearch Open Review), a new platform for open peer review of metaresearch. Platform services and access are free for authors and readers.
A new platform designed to transform how we review and share metaresearch
MetaROR is not a traditional scholarly journal, but a platform that operates according to the publish-review-curate model.
Under MetaROR’s publish-review-curate model, researchers will first publish their work on a preprint server or in a repository–for example, arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, MetaArXiv, OSF Preprints, PsyArXiv, SocArXiv, and Zenodo among others–and then submit it to MetaROR.
A MetaROR editor will assign reviewers with appropriate expertise. Review reports and (optionally) reviewer identities will be published on the MetaROR platform and linked to the article under review.
The MetaROR editor will publish an editorial assessment. Informed by the review reports, the editorial assessment summarises the strengths and weaknesses of the article. However, unlike traditional journal editors, the MetaROR editor won’t make a binary accept/reject decision.
This model will accelerate the communication of scholarly work since peer review will take place after publication rather than before. The model will also increase the value of peer review. Peer review will benefit not only the authors of a work but also the readers, who can use the published review reports to assess the research.
Authors of research reviewed and curated by MetaROR can opt to submit their work for publication in a traditional journal.
To streamline this process, MetaROR is developing partnerships with journals in various metaresearch disciplines. Should authors of reviewed and curated articles choose to submit their work to a journal, they can include the MetaROR review reports and editorial assessment in their submission, enabling journals to rapidly decide whether or not to publish the article.
So far, four journals, Collabra, Quantitative Science Studies, Science as Culture, and Scientometrics, have expressed an interest in partnering with MetaROR, with more to follow.
MetaROR is a community-owned platform run by academics working in diverse metaresearch (or research on research) disciplines. It aims to serve all metaresearch disciplines, including higher education studies, history of science, philosophy of science, science and technology studies, science of science, scientometrics, and sociology of science. You can browse the platform and learn how to submit your work for review below:
More information about the platform will be given in an online launch seminar next week Tuesday, 26 November. The seminar will be led by Kathy Zeiler and Ludo Waltman, the Editors-in-Chief of MetaROR, who will introduce the platform. Authors of articles reviewed by MetaROR will share their experiences, and journal editors will reflect on how they expect to collaborate with MetaROR to streamline publication processes. Anyone interested in metaresearch or innovation in academic publishing is welcome to join this seminar!