BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Research on Research - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://researchonresearch.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Research on Research
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20230101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20241203T130000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20241203T143000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250806T110856Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250806T111052Z
UID:2549-1733230800-1733236200@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Utility of LLMs in identifying and assessing academic genres
DESCRIPTION:The European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH) in partnership with the Research on Research Institute (RoRI) is proud to present the next webinar in its series on research evaluation as it is practiced across disciplines and countries. \n\n\n\nThis is the second event in a thematic line on AI in research assessment. This time we ask how large language models (LLMs) can support assessment of various academic genres. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nINTRODUCTIONResearch assessment as intertextual reading: Opportunities and challenges in the use of Artificial intelligence in evaluation of SSHSpecial advisor Dr Jon Holm\, Research Council of Norway \n\n\n\nSPEAKERSEvaluating social science\, arts and humanities journal article quality with ChatGPTProfessor Mike Thelwall\, University of Sheffield \n\n\n\nResearch quality evaluation of journal articles is time-consuming\, even for post-publication expert review tasks like national research evaluation exercises. It is also necessary to assess the strength of candidates’ works for recruitment and promotion. This talk assesses ChatGPT’s ability to score social science\, arts and humanities journal articles using papers and criteria from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2021. The systemic implications of using artificial intelligence to fully or partially replace human judgement for this core task will also be discussed. \n\n\n\nAdaptation of neural language models to different textual domains and the use of language models for comparative analysis of textDr Denis Newman-Griffis\, Senior Lecturer\, University of Sheffield\, and a Research Fellow of the Research on Research Institute \n\n\n\nSpeakers\n\n\n\nMike Thelwall (he) is a Professor of Data Science in the Information School at the University of Sheffield in the UK. He primarily investigates quantitative methods to support research evaluation\, including artificial intelligence\, citation analysis and altmetrics. He has recently shown that ChatGPT can provide useful research quality assessments for published journal articles. His books include: Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators\, Altmetrics\, and Artificial Intelligence (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.00135). He is an associate editor of the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology and sits on five other editorial boards. \n\n\n\nDenis Newman-Griffis (they/them) is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Sheffield Centre for Machine Intelligence and a British Academy Innovation Fellow. They lead the Research on Research Institute’s GRAIL project on Responsible AI and Machine Learning for research funding and evaluation\, and they are an active participant in Responsible AI policy discussions in research\, education\, and government. \n\n\n\nJon Holm (he) is a special advisor at the Research council of Norway where he works with the development of national research assessment in Norway and the use of AI in research evaluation and analysis. Jon and Denis have recently published on the potential and pitfalls of the use of AI in research financing: Holm et al. (2025). “Big Data for Big Investments: Making Responsible and Effective Use of Data Science and AI in Research Councils” in Nielsen et al (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Evaluation\, Routledge 2025 (ch. 7)
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/utility-of-llms-in-identifying-and-assessing-academic-genres/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Chat-GPT.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250319T150000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250319T160000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250217T152217Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250217T152451Z
UID:2209-1742396400-1742400000@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Do Grant Proposal Texts Matter for Funding Decisions? A Field Experiment
DESCRIPTION:19 March 2025 08:00 PDT  / 15:00 GMT / 16:00 CET \n\n\n\nScientists and funding agencies invest considerable resources in writing and evaluating grant proposals. But do grant proposal texts noticeably change panel decisions in single blind review? \n\n\n\nWe report on a field experiment conducted by The Dutch Research Council (NWO) in collaboration with the authors in an early-career competition for awards of 800\,000 euros of research funding. A random half of panelists were shown a CV and only a one-paragraph summary of the proposed research\, while the other half were shown a CV and a full proposal. We find that withholding proposal texts from panelists did not detectibly impact their proposal rankings. This result suggests that the resources devoted to writing and evaluating grant proposals may not have their intended effect of facilitating the selection of the most promising science. \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nAbout the Speaker\n\n\n\n\nMüge Simsek is an Assistant Professor of Sociology in the programme group Institutions\, Inequalities and Life Courses at the University of Amsterdam. She earned her PhD from Utrecht University in 2019 and completed postdoctoral research at both Utrecht University and the Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. Prior to her current role\, she worked as a lecturer at University College Groningen. Her research centers on the integration processes of immigrants and their offspring\, with a particular emphasis on the role of religion. In parallel\, she maintains a secondary research agenda focused on the organization of science and inequality within academia.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/do-grant-proposal-texts-matter-for-funding-decisions-a-field-experiment/
CATEGORIES:Experiments
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/pexels-pixabay-87611-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250423T080000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250423T090000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250730T114546Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250730T114629Z
UID:2540-1745395200-1745398800@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:An experiment with Distributed Peer Review
DESCRIPTION:As it becomes increasingly difficult to find experts to carry out peer reviews\, the Volkswagen Foundation in Hanover\, Germany’s largest research funding organisation\, is testing an alternative method: distributed peer review (DPR). In this approach\, grant applicants review each other’s proposals. The process could make it easier to find suitable reviewers\, especially as there is an incentive for reviewers to participate in order to have their own work considered. Applicants gain insights that could improve their own proposals by receiving more diverse feedback. DPR may also help to bring out more creative and daring research ideas. \n\n\n\nWhile it’s not without challenges\, including concerns about workload and potential competition\, the early feedback from researchers is promising. Roughly 74% said they trusted the process to be fair in giving funding to the best research\, and 70% of respondents said they thought it would help to identify more adventurous grant proposals than those selected by the existing peer review process\, which is conducted by panelists appointed by the foundation. \n\n\n\nCould this be a model for future grant processes in research funding? Further analysis seeks to answer this question. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nHanna Denecke is a passionate advocate for curiosity-driven research and the transformative power of bold\, out-of-the-box ideas. As head of the Exploration team at the Volkswagen Foundation\, she is committed to supporting groundbreaking research that has the potential to reshape the future of science and society. With a background in economics and extensive experience in research management\, Hanna is keen to identify and promote experimental approaches to research funding and to further the Foundation’s mission of empowering researchers to explore bold\, experimental paths that can ultimately transform both science and society.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/an-experiment-with-distributed-peer-review/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/pexels-pixabay-87611-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250430T160000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250430T180000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250806T120046Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250806T120333Z
UID:2552-1746028800-1746036000@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Do we need a new generation of public institutions for ST&I?
DESCRIPTION:Do we need a new generation of public institutions for ST&I? \n\n\n\nPublic institutions for science and technology have hardly changed over half a century; even the UK’s most recent creation\, ARIA\, is consciously modelled on a US institution founded in the 1960s. But there is much to learn from other sectors that have innovated far more\, including business. The deep institutional conservatism of public science may be one factor behind the continuous decline of R&D productivity. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis talk from Sir Geoff Mulgan\, Professor of Collective Intelligence\, Public Policy and Social Innovation\, UCL STEaPP & Co-founder\, The Institutional Architecture Lab (TIAL)\, will provide a diagnosis\, share alternative ways of thinking being used by some governments around the world\, and point to a potentially very different institutional landscape for science and technology in the 2030s. \n\n\n\nThis event will be chaired by James Wilsdon\, Professor of Research Policy\, UCL & Executive Director\, Research on Research Institute. \n\n\n\nAnjana Ahuja\, Science Commentator at the Financial Times\, William Cullerne Bown\, Journalist at The Independent and New Scientist\, and Ine Steenmans\, Associate Professor in Futures\, Analysis and Policy at UCL\, will join as discussants. \n\n\n\nArticle in ResearchProfessional covering the seminar\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nFlashpoints & faultlines in science\, technology\, engineering & public policy: a STEaPP seminar series \n\n\n\nScience\, technology and engineering policy has never been more important\, nor more contested. Over the next year\, UCL’s Department of Science\, Technology\, Engineering and Public Policy (STEaPP) will be holding a series of seminars under the umbrella theme of ‘Flashpoints & faultlines in science\, technology\, engineering and public policy’. These are designed to provoke and stimulate fresh lines of thought\, debate and research within the department\, across UCL and beyond. \n\n\n\nAll staff and students in STEaPP are warmly invited to participate\, as are colleagues from across UCL with an interest in these topics. The series is being convened by Geoff Mulgan and James Wilsdon\, and is being organised with the support of the Research on Research Institute (RoRI)\, based within STEaPP.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/do-we-need-a-new-generation-of-public-institutions-for-sti/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/RoRI-STEaPP-seminar-series-banner.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250521T160000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250521T170000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250730T114823Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250806T104842Z
UID:2542-1747843200-1747846800@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Two-stage versus continuous application processing
DESCRIPTION:Curious about how different grant processes shape outcomes for both applicants and funders? In this talk\, we share our experiences with continuous and two-stage processes – from shrinking average waiting times by more than 60 % through continuous handling\, to reducing overall writing effort by nearly half using a two-stage model.  \n\n\n\nOur analyses reveal how each approach influences submission patterns\, applicant satisfaction\, and administrative load. We will present key insights from our evaluations (including comparisons with other funders)\, highlighting when and why a particular process may be most effective. 
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/two-stage-versus-continuous-application-processing/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/pexels-pixabay-87611-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250527T160000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250527T180000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250806T120611Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250806T120629Z
UID:2555-1748361600-1748368800@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:More and More and More: why energy transitions are an unhelpful myth
DESCRIPTION:Think we’re transitioning to green energy? Think again. Join us for a talk on the history\, mythology and politics of energy transitions.\n\n\n\nJoin us for a compelling discussion with Jean-Baptiste Fressoz\, historian and researcher at CNRS & the Alexandre Koyré Center of EHESS in Paris\, as he forensically dissects the past and future potential for energy transitions. \n\n\n\nFressoz’s new book More and More and More; an all-consuming history of energy – described by The Economist as ‘necessary\, eye-opening and frequently gobsmacking’ – challenges the widely held assumption that our energy history is a linear progression from wood to coal\, oil\, nuclear\, and ultimately to green energy. Instead\, he argues that each new phase of energy use remains inextricably linked to its predecessors\, creating a complex web of interdependencies. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThis seminar\, the second in our new series on ‘Flashpoints & faultlines’ will be chaired by Neil Morisetti (Professor of Climate and Resource Security\, and Head of the Department for Science\, Technology\, Engineering and Public Policy (STEaPP) at UCL\, and former UK Government Special Representative for Climate Change). \n\n\n\nWe will also have contributions from discussants: Dr Bipashyee Ghosh\, Lecturer in Engineering\, Innovation and Public Policy at STEaPP-UCL\, and Oliver Morton (Senior and Briefings Editor\, The Economist). \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nFlashpoints & faultlines in science\, technology\, engineering & public policy: a STEaPP seminar series\n\n\n\nScience\, technology and engineering policy has never been more important\, nor more contested. Over the next year\, UCL’s Department of Science\, Technology\, Engineering and Public Policy (STEaPP) will be holding a series of seminars under the umbrella theme of ‘Flashpoints & faultlines in science\, technology\, engineering and public policy’. These are designed to provoke and stimulate fresh lines of thought\, debate and research within the department\, across UCL and beyond. \n\n\n\nAll staff and students in STEaPP are warmly invited to participate\, as are colleagues from across UCL with an interest in these topics. The series is being convened by Geoff Mulgan and James Wilsdon\, and is being organised with the support of the Research on Research Institute (RoRI)\, based within STEaPP. \n\n\n\nSeminars will take place from 4pm to 5:30pm\, on the last Tuesday or Wednesday of the month\, and will be followed by an informal drinks and nibbles reception to 6pm. The seminars are held in person as an opportunity to strengthen collaborative links across STEaPP and wider UCL.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/more-and-more-and-more-why-energy-transitions-are-an-unhelpful-myth/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/RoRI-STEaPP-seminar-series-banner.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250620T120000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250620T130000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250730T114941Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250806T132942Z
UID:2543-1750420800-1750424400@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Launching Funding by Algorithm: A Handbook for research funders on using AI
DESCRIPTION:Join us for the launch of Funding by Algorithm: A handbook for responsible uses of AI and machine learning by research funders – a major new publication from the Research on Research Institute (RoRI). \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAI is already transforming research systems around the world. But how can funders make informed\, ethical\, and effective choices about using AI in their work? \n\n\n\nFor the last two years\, RoRI’s GRAIL project has worked closely with research funders from around the world to understand how funders can responsibly and effectively make use of AI and machine learning technologies in the vital work of research funding and assessment.  \n\n\n\nOur new handbook Funding by Algorithm distils insights\, strategies\, and case studies from this global collaboration into a practical\, easy-to-use handbook for funders and organisations navigating the fast-changing world of AI in research systems. \n\n\n\nAt this online launch event\, we’ll introduce the handbook\, share key lessons from the GRAIL project\, and hear reflections from leading research funders already engaging with these technologies. Whether you’re cautious\, curious\, or already experimenting with AI\, this event will offer valuable guidance on how to move forward responsibly. \n\n\n\nYou will hear from speakers including: \n\n\n\n\nJames Wilsdon\, Executive Director of the Research on Research Institute\n\n\n\nDenis Newman-Griffis\, University of Sheffield and GRAIL Project Lead\n\n\n\nKatrin Milzow\, Swiss National Science Foundation\n\n\n\nJon Holm\, Research Council of Norway\n\n\n\nInés Bouzón\, “la Caixa” Foundation\n\n\n\nAlexandra Apavaloae\, Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada\n\n\n\nJennifer Gold\, ESRC and UK Metascience Unit\n\n\n\nLidia Borrell-Damian\, Science Europe
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/launching-funding-by-algorithm-a-handbook-for-research-funders-on-using-ai/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GRAIL-cover-image.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250630T080000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250707T170000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20250117T105614Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250905T143701Z
UID:2135-1751270400-1751907600@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Metascience 2025 Conference
DESCRIPTION:Save the Date: \n\n\n\nJune 30 – July 2\, 2025University College London\n\n\n\nFrom 30 June to 2 July 2025\, the Research on Research Institute (RoRI) and the Center for Open Science (COS) welcomed over 800 researchers\, funders\, policymakers\, and innovators from 65 countries to explore the future of science and research systems. \n\n\n\n\nMetascience 2025 marked one of RoRI’s biggest milestones to date and the largest gathering of the global metascience community. Attendees came from across research\, funding\, publishing\, policy\, technology\, and related sectors to share evidence\, exchange ideas\, and reflect on how research systems can be improved. \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nMetascience 2025 showcased the power of collaboration across the metascience community\, leaving a lasting legacy of knowledge\, connections\, and inspiration for the future of research. \n\n\n\n \n\nConference sessions\n\n\n\n\nWatch the main sessions from Metascience 2025\, covering policymaking\, funding\, the science of science\, AI\, new institutions\, and open knowledge infrastructures \n\n\n\n\nSee the full story of Metascience 2025 on our Wakelet\, featuring photos\, media coverage\, and highlights from the conference.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/metascience-2025-conference/
CATEGORIES:2025
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/metascience.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260301T080000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20261231T170000
DTSTAMP:20260407T140645
CREATED:20260227T170622Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260319T101247Z
UID:2757-1772352000-1798736400@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:ECR Research on Research Seminar Series (ECR RoRSS)
DESCRIPTION:We’re launching a new series of online talks by early career researchers (ECRs) on metascience / research on research topics (in their broadest senses). Each talk could be focused on completed research you want to share\, work in progress you want to brainstorm with colleagues\, or ideas for advancing metascience or future research you’d like to try out. \n\n\n\nAnyone self-identifying as an ECR can present\, and seminar attendance will be open to all ( we strongly encourage senior colleagues to join!). Webinars will be held on a monthly basis at lunchtimes (UK/EU) throughout the first half of 2026\, with flexible timing to include ECRs from across the globe. \n\n\n\nWe see a lot of potential in this\, and we hope this series becomes a vibrant\, inclusive\, and valuable space for knowledge-sharing and network-building for ECRs and the wider metascience community.  \n\n\n\nIf you’d like to present\, suggest a speaker\, or stay updated on upcoming talks\, please fill in this form or email us! \n\n\n\nEmail contact: a.l.butters@sheffield.ac.uk \n\n\n\nECR RoRSS organising committee \n\n\n\nAnna Butters (Sheffield/RoRI)\, Becky Ioppolo (Cambridge)\, Mollie Etheridge (Anglia Ruskin/Cambridge)\, Allison Beggs (Cambridge)\, Melanie Benson Marshall (Sheffield/RoRI)\, Josie Coburn (UCL/RoRI)\, Youyou Wu (UCL/RoRI)\, Similo Ngwenya (UCL/RoRI)\, Seunghyun Lee (UCL/RoRI)
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/ecr-research-on-research-seminar-series-ecr-rorss/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/allison-saeng-5Okurf4N93g-unsplash-scaled-e1772212018733.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR