BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Research on Research - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://researchonresearch.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Research on Research
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20250101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260301T080000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20261231T170000
DTSTAMP:20260429T200559
CREATED:20260227T170622Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260319T101247Z
UID:2757-1772352000-1798736400@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:ECR Research on Research Seminar Series (ECR RoRSS)
DESCRIPTION:We’re launching a new series of online talks by early career researchers (ECRs) on metascience / research on research topics (in their broadest senses). Each talk could be focused on completed research you want to share\, work in progress you want to brainstorm with colleagues\, or ideas for advancing metascience or future research you’d like to try out. \n\n\n\nAnyone self-identifying as an ECR can present\, and seminar attendance will be open to all ( we strongly encourage senior colleagues to join!). Webinars will be held on a monthly basis at lunchtimes (UK/EU) throughout the first half of 2026\, with flexible timing to include ECRs from across the globe. \n\n\n\nWe see a lot of potential in this\, and we hope this series becomes a vibrant\, inclusive\, and valuable space for knowledge-sharing and network-building for ECRs and the wider metascience community.  \n\n\n\nIf you’d like to present\, suggest a speaker\, or stay updated on upcoming talks\, please fill in this form or email us! \n\n\n\nEmail contact: a.l.butters@sheffield.ac.uk \n\n\n\nECR RoRSS organising committee \n\n\n\nAnna Butters (Sheffield/RoRI)\, Becky Ioppolo (Cambridge)\, Mollie Etheridge (Anglia Ruskin/Cambridge)\, Allison Beggs (Cambridge)\, Melanie Benson Marshall (Sheffield/RoRI)\, Josie Coburn (UCL/RoRI)\, Youyou Wu (UCL/RoRI)\, Similo Ngwenya (UCL/RoRI)\, Seunghyun Lee (UCL/RoRI)
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/ecr-research-on-research-seminar-series-ecr-rorss/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/allison-saeng-5Okurf4N93g-unsplash-scaled-e1772212018733.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260526T140000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260526T150000
DTSTAMP:20260429T200559
CREATED:20260417T115335Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260417T115849Z
UID:2781-1779804000-1779807600@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Scientific Production in the Era of Large Language Models: Early Evidence from Large-scale Preprint Data
DESCRIPTION:Tuesday 26 May at 9:00 (EDT) / 14:00 (BST) / 15:00 (CEST) \n\n\n\nSpeaker: Yian Yin\, Cornell University\, USA \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAbout the seminar \n\n\n\nThe rapid adoption of AI across disciplines is reshaping the landscape of scientific production. While both enthusiasm and concern about generative AI in research are rising\, systematic empirical evidence on the impact of large language models (LLMs) remains limited. In this talk\, I draw on several large-scale analyses to examine how LLM use affects the productivity of individual scientists\, reshapes attention to prior work\, introduces hallucinated content into the scientific record\, and creates new challenges for peer review. Taken together\, these findings provide macro-level evidence on the impact of generative AI on science\, highlighting the need for institutions\, journals\, funding agencies\, and the broader public to rethink how scientific work should be evaluated in this new era. \n\n\n\nAbout the speaker \n\n\n\nYian Yin is Assistant Professor of Information Science at Cornell University. His research interests lie at the intersection of network science and computational social science\, with a particular focus on the science of science. He applies and develops novel computational tools to understand how individual\, social\, and environmental processes independently and jointly promote (or inhibit) scientific progress and innovation achievements.His research has been published in journals including Science\, Nature and Nature Human Behaviour\, featured in media outlets such as Forbes\, Scientific American\, Washington Post\, and Harvard Business Review\, and supported by research grants from National Science Foundation\, National Aeronautics and Space Administration\, Schmidt Sciences\, and UK Economic and Social Research Council. \n\n\n\nRegister in advance for this seminar: \n\n\n\nhttps://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/JF0DKNl3TFehf54YHgLmuA \n\n\n\nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/scientific-production-in-the-era-of-large-language-models-early-evidence-from-large-scale-preprint-data/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/allison-saeng-5Okurf4N93g-unsplash-scaled-e1772212018733.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260617T120000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260617T130000
DTSTAMP:20260429T200559
CREATED:20260417T115904Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260417T120017Z
UID:2782-1781697600-1781701200@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Past and Future of Research Funding: From Beginnings to New Developments
DESCRIPTION:Wednesday 17 June 2026 13:00 (CEST) / 12:00 (BST) / 07:00 (EDT) \n\n\n\nFinn Luebber\, Universität Lübeck\, Germany \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAbout the seminar \n\n\n\nInstitutionally organized research funding is a rather new development that has its roots in the beginnings of the last century. A marked increase in funding during and after World War II in the US led to an era of increased research productivity and popularized project-based peer-reviewed research funding. This way of funding distribution eventually spread to all Western funding systems\, although at varying time points and to varying degrees. Today\, there is an increasing amount of criticism of this system\, especially due to deficiencies in fairness\, high direct and indirect costs\, and questionable validity. Alongside incremental suggestions to improve this process\, the critique also stimulated the development of new approaches\, of which lottery elements are one of the most discussed. While the outright random distribution of funding is viewed with skepticism\, tiebreaker lotteries for random allocation among proposals pre-selected through peer review have been welcomed more positively. \n\n\n\nIn a recent article our group proposed a third way: A lottery-first approach\, in which a lottery determines who is eligible to submit a full proposal. In the talk\, I will present the approach theoretically and present empirical data around fairness\, costs\, and satisfaction. \n\n\n\nFinally\, I will consider why\, despite these criticisms and emerging alternatives\, the funding system remains resistant to change\, and which functions beyond selecting proposals on epistemic merit may help explain this persistence. \n\n\n\nAbout the speaker \n\n\n\nFinn is a PhD candidate at the University of Lübeck in the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy where he currently performs theoretical and empirical research about the lottery-first approach to funding. His wider research interests include theory development\, causal inference\, and measurement error. Having backgrounds in both psychology and molecular life science\, he tries to understand the inner workings of academia and organized research production from multiple angles. \n\n\n\nRegister in advance for this seminar: \n\n\n\nhttps://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/3XO13zn1Ts-HHidin4MFTw \n\n\n\nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/past-and-future-of-research-funding-from-beginnings-to-new-developments/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/allison-saeng-5Okurf4N93g-unsplash-scaled-e1772212018733.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR